Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Hard Times and Leadership


Franklin D. Roosevelt at his
first inaugural address on
March 4, 1933


As America awaits President Obama's address to Congress this evening, I thought it was appropriate to dig up FDR's first inaugural address.  Times aren't so different.  Are they?

The text below is from George Mason University's History Matters site.  The audio and video are available HERE on the American Rhetoric site.   






FDR’s First Inaugural Address

I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our people impel. This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.

In such a spirit on my part and on yours we face our common difficulties. They concern, thank God, only material things. Values have shrunken to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen; government of all kinds is faced by serious curtailment of income; the means of exchange are frozen in the currents of trade; the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no markets for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone.

More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment.

Yet our distress comes from no failure of substance. We are stricken by no plague of locusts.

Compared with the perils which our forefathers conquered because they believed and were not afraid, we have still much to be thankful for. Nature still offers her bounty and human efforts have multiplied it. Plenty is at our doorstep, but a generous use of it languishes in the very sight of the supply.

Primarily this is because the rulers of the exchange of mankind’s goods have failed, through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence, have admitted their failure, and abdicated. Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men.

True they have tried, but their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn tradition. Faced by failure of credit they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers.

They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish.

The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit.

Happiness lies not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort. The joy and moral stimulation of work no longer must be forgotten in the mad chase of evanescent profits. These dark days will be worth all they cost us if they teach us that our true destiny is not to be ministered unto but to minister to ourselves and to our fellow men.

Recognition of the falsity of material wealth as the standard of success goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit; and there must be an end to a conduct in banking and in business which too often has given to a sacred trust the likeness of callous and selfish wrongdoing. Small wonder that confidence languishes, for it thrives only on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful protection, on unselfish performance; without them it cannot live.

Restoration calls, however, not for changes in ethics alone. This Nation asks for action, and action now.

Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously. It can be accomplished in part by direct recruiting by the Government itself, treating the task as we would treat the emergency of a war, but at the same time, through this employment, accomplishing greatly needed projects to stimulate and reorganize the use of our natural resources.

Hand in hand with this we must frankly recognize the overbalance of population in our industrial centers and, by engaging on a national scale in a redistribution, endeavor to provide a better use of the land for those best fitted for the land. The task can be helped by definite efforts to raise the values of agricultural products and with this the power to purchase the output of our cities. It can be helped by preventing realistically the tragedy of the growing loss through foreclosure of our small homes and our farms. It can be helped by insistence that the Federal, State, and local governments act forthwith on the demand that their cost be drastically reduced. It can be helped by the unifying of relief activities which today are often scattered, uneconomical, and unequal. It can be helped by national planning for and supervision of all forms of transportation and of communications and other utilities which have a definitely public character. There are many ways in which it can be helped, but it can never be helped merely by talking about it. We must act and act quickly.

Finally, in our progress toward a resumption of work we require two safeguards against a return of the evils of the old order; there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments; there must be an end to speculation with other people’s money, and there must be provision for an adequate but sound currency.

There are the lines of attack. I shall presently urge upon a new Congress in special session detailed measures for their fulfillment, and I shall seek the immediate assistance of the several States.

Through this program of action we address ourselves to putting our own national house in order and making income balance outgo. Our international trade relations, though vastly important, are in point of time and necessity secondary to the establishment of a sound national economy. I favor as a practical policy the putting of first things first. I shall spare no effort to restore world trade by international economic readjustment, but the emergency at home cannot wait on that accomplishment.

The basic thought that guides these specific means of national recovery is not narrowly nationalistic. It is the insistence, as a first consideration, upon the interdependence of the various elements in all parts of the United States—a recognition of the old and permanently important manifestation of the American spirit of the pioneer. It is the way to recovery. It is the immediate way. It is the strongest assurance that the recovery will endure.

In the field of world policy I would dedicate this Nation to the policy of the good neighbor—the neighbor who resolutely respects himself and, because he does so, respects the rights of others—the neighbor who respects his obligations and respects the sanctity of his agreements in and with a world of neighbors.

If I read the temper of our people correctly, we now realize as we have never realized before our interdependence on each other; that we can not merely take but we must give as well; that if we are to go forward, we must move as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because without such discipline no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective. We are, I know, ready and willing to submit our lives and property to such discipline, because it makes possible a leadership which aims at a larger good. This I propose to offer, pledging that the larger purposes will bind upon us all as a sacred obligation with a unity of duty hitherto evoked only in time of armed strife.

With this pledge taken, I assume unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems.

Action in this image and to this end is feasible under the form of government which we have inherited from our ancestors. Our Constitution is so simple and practical that it is possible always to meet extraordinary needs by changes in emphasis and arrangement without loss of essential form. That is why our constitutional system has proved itself the most superbly enduring political mechanism the modern world has produced. It has met every stress of vast expansion of territory, of foreign wars, of bitter internal strife, of world relations.

It is to be hoped that the normal balance of executive and legislative authority may be wholly adequate to meet the unprecedented task before us. But it may be that an unprecedented demand and need for undelayed action may call for temporary departure from that normal balance of public procedure.

I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption.

But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis—broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe.

For the trust reposed in me I will return the courage and the devotion that befit the time. I can do no less.

We face the arduous days that lie before us in the warm courage of the national unity; with the clear consciousness of seeking old and precious moral values; with the clean satisfaction that comes from the stern performance of duty by old and young alike. We aim at the assurance of a rounded and permanent national life.

We do not distrust the future of essential democracy. The people of the United States have not failed. In their need they have registered a mandate that they want direct, vigorous action. They have asked for discipline and direction under leadership. They have made me the present instrument of their wishes. In the spirit of the gift I take it.

In this dedication of a Nation we humbly ask the blessing of God. May He protect each and every one of us. May He guide me in the days to come.

Source: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933, as published in Samuel Rosenman, ed., The Public Papers of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Volume Two: The Year of Crisis, 1933 (New York: Random House, 1938), 11–16.

Friday, August 26, 2011

Gratitude II

I thought to repost this from August 6, 2011 as we approach the American Thanksgiving holiday and as the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians escalates. These journalists are amazing. I'm thankful for what they're doing and praying for their safety.

************************************************************************************

My 9-year-old daughter asked me the other day if I miss Beirut, my home for the first 13 years of my life.  I explained that I miss my family, friends and the unparalleled beauty of the city, but I'm very happy I live and raise my kids in the United States now.  Then I told her that if I didn't have a family here, I'd be somewhere in the Arab world right now reporting on the uprisings.  She gasped and said, "But wouldn't you be scared?  You can get killed."  I acknowledged the fear and the danger but told her, if given the opportunity, I would love to be part of the change sweeping the region and I'd figure out how to stay safe. 

On second thought, would I really have the courage to be in Libya, Syria or Yemen right now?  Would I tolerate at age 40 the sound of bombs and the constant possibility of death that I and so many others tolerated as children during Lebanon's civil war?  Can I run as fast?  Would snipers spare me now as they did then?  And, what would cheer me up amid the chaos as my father's gifts of candy did every time we took shelter? 

I don't have the answers to those questions.  Perhaps courage and adventure are for the young, and I'm squarely in my middle years now.  But as I follow the news every day, I'm amazed at the journalists who are risking their lives to shine the light on daily acts of injustice and brutality.  I worry about their safety and their mental health.  I worry about them being kidnapped and tortured.  I just worry. 

But more than worry, I feel an enormous sense of gratitude that they are there.  Oppression all over the Arab world is nothing new.  What is new is that it's no longer hidden behind the facade of the oppressors.  Thanks to the Internet, the world knows to pay attention.  Thanks to courageous journalists, the world can have eyes and ears on the ground to make sense of the events.  Hopefully, this translates into international determination and action to stop and prevent atrocities.  My hat is off to these amazingly brave men and women who are truly helping to shape a better future for millions of people.

Godspeed!

Laura

Sunday, August 21, 2011

AFTER GADDAFI


A Libyan child with the rebel flag. (AP)
At this moment, I am glued to my laptop and television watching events unfold in the Libyan capital as Gaddafi's tyranny comes to an end.  As people rightfully celebrate, I can't help but think of what the next 40 years hold for the Libyan people.  I will write more about this very quickly, but for now, I wanted to repost A Note to the Arab People from a few months back, which is about building nations after the fall of dictators. 

I sincerely hope the people of Libya will show the world how to build a nation on a rock solid foundation. 


Here the post:



A Note to the Arab People


As an immigrant to the United States from your part of the world, I am so thrilled that your sacrifices, courage and persistence are bearing fruit. I am following your efforts and cheering you on every day. I should also tell you that every American I know is cheering you on.

We are filled joy and hope for your future, and we are determined to help you and stand with you. You see our country was born out of a revolution too. The early Americans fought, organized and struggled against tyranny. They started with nothing and from nothing. They, like you, took huge risks and suffered countless casualties to reach that day of unlikely victory. But, while our independence from Great Britain was a major turning point in our history, it was only the beginning of a lot of work that shaped this country.

What followed independence was simply awesome! The land’s best minds came together to create the pillars upon which this great nation stands today. It was a messy process with a number of false starts and much disagreement and debate, but what resulted has sustained this great country for more than 223 years. Those pillars didn’t eliminate all injustice and free the enslaved; they didn’t immediately produce peace and prosperity; and they sure didn’t solve every social ill. But they have guided us toward a more perfect nation with every passing year. They are solid, strong and unshakable pillars that have withstood a bloody civil war, much strife, economic devastation, and many social and political movements of both the violent and nonviolent kind.

So, as you risk everything and turn your world upside down in the quest for freedom and democracy, I hope you deliberately choose strong foundations that will last for hundreds of years as ours have. Our founding fathers were far from perfect, but they were intent on creating a country in which its people are its epicenter. I pray that this is only the beginning of your progress and that you, the people, are the epicenter of your new systems of government.


I heard the criticisms when I went back home some years ago, especially this one: “The U.S. is only 200+ years old but we have thousands of years of history and culture. What can you possibly teach us?” I also heard much about U.S. foreign policy not being true to the ideals we hold sacred inside our country and that the U.S. exploits the rest of the world for its own gain. There's more than one kernel of truth in those and many other criticisms, and our nation is not yet perfect. But our founding fathers were principled and honorable as you are, and the results of their work speak for themselves. So for the sake of your nations' next 200 years, I hope you take a look at what has worked here, liberally copy from our founding principles and consider embracing any or all of our ideals. I'm fairly confident today's Americans won't mind one bit.

Lastly, in the coming months and years, please don’t forget that you are our brothers and sisters in struggle—no matter your religion, skin color or political convictions. We share your hopes and dreams and we stand with you with open hearts and minds.

 Godspeed!

 A Lebanese-American

p.s.: The documents outlining the pillars of our great democracy make for inspiring reading material. The links are below, but I have to warn you that you may very well get emotional reading. I know I do.
  1. The Declaration of Independence--The document that started it all.
  2. The Constitution--Solid but flexible enough to remain at the core of our nation.
  3. The Bill of Rights--This is central to many of the freedoms we enjoy. It is truly an amazing document.
Images of all three original documents are available in case you want a little extra magic and inspiraton. 

Monday, August 8, 2011

Tom Friedman on Hama

For those following the appalling developments in Syria, I wanted to share a recent column by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman whose work I've referenced in two previous posts, the Syrians' Turn and Still Angry.  Of all people who write about the Middle East, he gets it best.  Here's his column from August 2.

 

The New Hama Rules

What a difference three decades make. In April 1982, I was assigned to be the Beirut correspondent for The Times. Before I arrived, word had filtered back to Lebanon about an uprising in February in the Syrian town of Hama — famed for its water wheels on the Orontes River. Rumor had it that then President Hafez al-Assad had put down a Sunni Muslim rebellion in Hama by shelling the neighborhoods where the revolt was centered, then dynamiting buildings, some with residents still inside, and then steamrolling them flat, like a parking lot. It was hard to believe and even harder to check. No one had cellphones back then, and foreign media were not allowed access.

That May I got a visa to Syria, just as Hama had been reopened. It was said that the Syrian regime was “encouraging” Syrians to drive through the town, see the crushed neighborhoods and contemplate the silence. So I just hired a cab in Damascus and went. It was, and remains, one of the most chilling things I’ve ever seen: Whole neighborhoods, the size of four football fields, looked as though a tornado had swept back and forth over them for a week — but this was not the work of Mother Nature.

This was an act of unprecedented brutality, a settling of scores between Assad’s minority Alawite regime and Syria’s Sunni Muslim majority that had dared to challenge him. If you kicked the ground in some areas that had been flattened, a tattered book, a shred of clothing, the tip of a steel reinforcing rod were easily exposed. It was a killing field. According to Amnesty International, up to 20,000 people were buried there. I contemplated the silence and gave it a name: “Hama Rules.”

Hama Rules were the prevailing leadership rules in the Arab world. They said: Rule by fear — strike fear in the heart of your people by letting them know that you play by no rules at all, so they won’t ever, ever, ever think about rebelling against you.

It worked for a long time in Syria, Iraq, Tunisia, etc., until it didn’t. Today, Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad, Hafez’s son, is now repeating his father’s mass murdering tactics to quash the new Syrian uprising, again centered in Hama. But, this time, the Syrian people are answering with their own Hama Rules, which are quite remarkable. They say: “We know that every time we walk out the door to protest, you will gun us down, without mercy. But we are not afraid anymore, and we will not be powerless anymore. Now, you leaders will be afraid of us. Those are our Hama Rules.”

This is the struggle today across the Arab world — the new Hama Rules versus the old Hama Rules — “I will make you afraid” versus “We are not afraid anymore.”

Good for the people. It is hard to exaggerate how much these Arab regimes wasted the lives of an entire Arab generation, with their foolish wars with Israel and each other and their fraudulent ideologies that masked their naked power grabs and predatory behavior. Nothing good was possible with these leaders. The big question today, though, is this: Is progress possible without them?

That is, once these regimes are shucked off, can the different Arab communities come together as citizens and write social contracts for how to live together without iron-fisted dictators — can they write a positive set of Hama Rules based not on anyone fearing anyone else, but rather on mutual respect, protection of minority and women’s rights and consensual government?

It is not easy. These dictators built no civil society, no institutions and no democratic experience for their people to work with. Iraq demonstrates that it is theoretically possible to go from an old Hama Rules tyranny to consensual politics — but it required $1 trillion, thousands of casualties, a herculean mediation effort by the U.S. and courageous Iraqi political will to live together — and even now the final outcome is uncertain. Iraqis know how vital we were in this transition, which is why many don’t want us to leave.
Now Yemen, Libya, Syria, Egypt and Tunisia are all going to attempt similar transitions — at once — but without a neutral arbiter to referee. It is unprecedented in this region, and we can already see just how hard this will be. I still believe that the democratic impulse by all these Arab peoples to throw off their dictators is heroic and hugely positive. They will oust all of them in the end. But the new dawn will take time to appear.

I think the former foreign minister of Jordan, Marwan Muasher, has the right attitude. “One cannot expect this to be a linear process or to be done overnight,” he said to me. “There were no real political parties, no civil society institutions ready to take over in any of these countries. I do not like to call this the ‘Arab Spring.’ I prefer to call it the ‘Arab Awakening,’ and it is going to play out over the next 10 to 15 years before it settles down. We are going to see all four seasons multiple times. These people are experiencing democracy for the first time. They are going to make mistakes on the political and economic fronts. But I remain optimistic in the long run, because people have stopped feeling powerless.”

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

STILL ANGRY

Anders Behring Breivik
In the last few days, I've accumulated some rage and writing this post may be my only outlet.  

Here's one of the reasons:

My 9-year-old son walked into the dining room the other day waving a newspaper and screaming.  Alarmed, I asked what the matter was.  He was almost breathless. For the first time, he had just seen the headline about the Norway tragedy.  "Mom, can you believe this? This guy actually shot at kids," he said in a panic. "Yes, he did," I replied. "So, mom, kids my age had to run while this guy was shooting at them and some even drowned trying to escape," he said.  You see he follows the news fairly closely for his age, but I thought this particular event was so tragic that my husband and I kept it from him and his sister.  We thought explaining why and how such a tragedy could be possible can wait.  Now the secret is out and he's so angry.

As I see it, anger is the proper reaction to this horrible massacre, so let's get some things straight:
  1. Killing children is not a form of protest, no matter the cause. It's criminal--pure and simple.
  2. Not all Muslims are extremists by any stretch of the imagination, just like not all Jews are oppressors of Palestinians and not all Christians are crusaders.
  3. No one religious group holds the moral high ground. We're all guilty of something some time in our history.
  4. Human rights are universal. They're not reserved for any one ethnic or religious group.
  5. Hate and brutality do not advance a just cause. They're cowardly, pathetic and always destructive.
The second reason is a frequent theme on this blog:  The Syrian government's brutality and continued criminal existence.

Hafez Al Assad
Over the last several days, the regime has stepped up its crackdown on innocent civilians, especially in the city of Hama, the site of the infamous 1982 massacre.  In that first Hama massacre, rivers turned red from the blood of thousands killed by the regime, and that's not an exaggeration.  The elder Assad used tanks, artillery and air bombardment to level Hama after the Muslim Brotherhood revolted in the early 1980s.  (See Thomas Friedman’s 2005 reflection in the New York Times HERE.)  Now, the world is witnessing a second Hama massacre.  (See this NEWS report from Reuters and keep in mind events continue to unfold.)
 

Bashar Al Assad
I guess nearly 30 years later, some things haven’t changed.  The people of Hama are still oppressed, brave and demanding basic rights, and the young Assad is proving to be no less brutal than his father.  I fear the news reports aren’t telling the whole story as the number of victims climbs by the hour, but thanks to social media and reports by brave Syrians, the world is watching this time.  The only question is whether the outcome will be any different.

In case you’re wondering, writing this post didn’t help.  I’m still angry at hateful, brutal criminals, and I’m getting angrier at the world for continuing to watch them.



Wednesday, July 6, 2011

More on Congressman Dennis Kucinich

I want to share two articles from The Plain Dealer, Cleveland's daily paper, about my Congressman, Dennis Kucinich. I won't say much more than I said in my last post about his recent inept attempt at diplomacy in Syria. Please read these and make up your own mind about his credibility. Thanks to Plain Dealer politics writer Mark Naymik for sharing these.

(Click on the headlines to go to Cleveland.com, The Plain Dealer's online home.)


Published:  Monday, October 22, 2007

By Mark Naymik, The Plain Dealer

Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich has seen a UFO, writes Shirley MacLaine in her new book, "Sage-Ing While Age-Ing."

Kucinich, she writes on page143-144 of the book, "had a close sighting over my home in Graham, Washington, when I lived there. Dennis found his encounter extremely moving. The smell of roses drew him out to my balcony where, when he looked up, he saw a gigantic triangular craft, silent, and observing him. It hovered, soundless, for ten minutes or so, and sped away with a speed he couldn't comprehend. He said he felt a connection in his heart and heard directions in his mind."

Representatives of Kucinich's presidential campaign and congressional office have not responded to calls and e-mail asking whether the Cleveland Democratic congressman in fact saw a UFO or if there is another explanation for MacLaine's recollection.

MacLaine is a well-known believer of UFOs and reincarnation. And she's been close to Kucinich for decades. MacLaine is the godmother of Kucinich's daughter and attended Kucinich's 2005 Cleveland wedding to third wife, Elizabeth, who's often campaigning by his side.

MacLaine also recommended in the 1980s that Kucinich visit New Mexico spiritual adviser Chris Griscom, whom MacLaine featured in her then-best-selling book, "Dancing in the Light," describing how Griscom helped her communicate with trees. (Kucinich has insisted that Griscom was not his spiritual adviser but a "teacher and a very good friend.")

MacLaine, who shares Kucinich's opposition to using weapons in space, doesn't shed any more light in her book on Kucinich's close encounter, including when it happened. But to read more about MacLaine's beliefs, pick up a copy of the book. It goes on sale next month -- on Election Day.

© 2011 cleveland.com. All rights reserved.


Many Kucinich backers are out there – way out

Published:  Monday, March 12, 2003

By Mark Naymik, The Plain Dealer

Some of Dennis Kucinich's politics are a long way from polka, bowling and kielbasa. Kucinich, now in his fourth term in the U.S. House, has added a constituency - one likely to appreciate crystals and incense more than the ethnic icons he frequently cites to highlight the character of his hometown.

Known for crusades to keep open local steel mills and hospitals and to improve safety near railroad crossings, Kucinich remains rooted in a pro-labor populist social agenda.

But he also can claim the support of a network of peace activists and New Age gurus, from those who practice meditation to those who embrace alternative religions. They are attracted to his message of spirituality and peace. He is relying on this cultivated network - even at risk of being tagged the "Moonbeam Congressman" - to help him win the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination.

Kucinich, a strict vegetarian whose friends include a New Mexico spiritual adviser, has won converts specifically with his legislation to ban the use of weapons in space and to create a U.S. Department of Peace.

The legislation itself has garnered little support from his congressional colleagues, but it has become Kucinich's calling card, remaining at the center of his anti-war campaign and speeches about the need to view the world "in a way that is interconnected."

He took that message to a Malibu, Calif., home last year, for instance, where about 250 people - including futurist and author Barbara Marx Hubbard, former astronaut and lecturer Brian O'Leary and "Bionic Woman" actress Lindsay Wagner - turned out to meet him.

"We are here tonight to talk about a dream, a vision, which we can make a reality, to create for ourselves a world of peace by making sure that the heavens themselves are never going to be marred by weapons," he said.

Carol Rosin, a peace activist who runs the Institute for Cooperation in Space, sponsored the event. In 1997, Rosin helped arrange to send the cremated remains of her friend - LSD guru Timothy Leary - into space, fulfilling his final wish. Today, she's just as dedicated to Kucinich's cause. "I am out working for him, day and night, and I'm not getting paid," she said. "I'm doing everything I can because I think he is the only chance we have got to enter into a new paradigm, or otherwise we are all going to die."

She sells videotapes of Kucinich's Malibu speech and of one he gave at the Agape International Spiritual Center in Culver City, Calif., one of nation's largest multicultural churches. The tapes, which include Kucinich's Web site information, cost $40. The money benefits the space institute, which heavily promotes Kucinich's peace-related activities.

Disciples of peace

Kucinich said Rosin is just one of thousands of "enthusiastic supporters" and insisted his politics are "mainstream." "I don't start at the margins," he said. "I started in the ward clubs of Cleveland, and I don't forget that. My politics come from the neighborhoods of the city."

Kucinich also has forged a relationship with self-help and pop-religion author Marianne Williamson, whose books frequently top the bestseller lists. "She's an amazingly gifted person" whose talent is reaching out to people, he said.

Williamson has her own peace organization, Global Renaissance Alliance, through which she promotes her books - and Kucinich's effort to create a Department of Peace. She advertises a lobbying boot camp for peace activists that will feature an appearance by Kucinich next month in Arlington, Va. "Train in the principles of deep democracy, then lobby your congressperson and senators to create a Cabinet-level Department of Peace," reads her promotion for the event, which costs $225.

The workshop coincides with Kucinich's plans to reintroduce legislation to create the department.

In an event this month billed as "Imagine America," Williamson and healthy living author John Robbins will join Kucinich in Kentucky to discuss how to create a better America. The rally will cost $5.

Kucinich cites a number of other authors and lecturers as confidants, including Chris Griscom, whom he described as a close friend and adviser. Griscom is a well-known spiritual adviser whose Web site describes her institute as an "enchanting center for spiritual healing and multi-incarnational exploration."

Kucinich traveled to Galisteo, N.M., to meet her in the mid-1980s, a time when he was an unemployed politician.

The MacLaine factor

Kucinich's friend Shirley MacLaine, who is also the godmother of Kucinich's daughter, recommended he visit Griscom. MacLaine had featured Griscom in her then-best-selling book, "Dancing in the Light," describing how Griscom helped her communicate with trees. At the time, Kucinich insisted that Griscom was not his spiritual adviser but a "teacher and a very good friend."

Kucinich also has built a relationship with John Hagelin, a Harvard-trained physicist and the Natural Law Party's 2000 presidential candidate. Hagelin, who follows the teachings of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the leader of the transcendental meditation movement, attended Kucinich's presidential campaign stop last month in Fairfield, Iowa, home of the Maharishi University of Management. Hagelin said Kucinich can count on getting volunteers from Fairfield.

"He's got a lot of natural silence, and an open and clear mind," said Hagelin. "A lot of members of both parties get this. Dennis Kucinich is a little bit more expressive, bolder and less political."

Hagelin is director of the Institute of Science, Technology and Public Policy at Maharishi University, whose Web site also promotes Kucinich's Department of Peace legislation. The institute also claims it helped Kucinich draft legislation aimed at providing a possible solution to terrorism, following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The legislation - an amendment to a military appropriations bill - called for spending $60 million to train military personnel how to meditate and utilize other stress-relieving techniques backed by scientific studies, Hagelin said. Hagelin believes that mass meditation can reduce conflict worldwide.

Kucinich said he never had any direct involvement with the proposed amendment, which was never accepted and submitted. "There was a discussion at a staff level that occurred," he said. "I get hundreds of requests for amendments."

Kucinich, however, said he welcomes the Natural Law Party's support under his umbrella. He said the Democratic Party created the third parties "by running to the middle."

"What I'm trying to do is go back to the big tent so that everyone who felt alienated . . . could come back through my candidacy."

Embracing the New Age

Kucinich clearly has targeted alternative audiences by speaking at New Age conventions and giving interviews to non-mainstream publications.

Kucinich, for instance, appears on the August 2002 cover of Whole Life Times, billed as a "Journal of the Holistic Lifestyle," which is published in Malibu.

In it, he also responds to the question of whether he supports "full disclosure by the government of information on UFOs and other anomalous space sightings?"

"I'm in favor of expanding opportunities for people to have a deeper understanding of the universe. . . . I don't think we could ever discount the possibility of other intelligent life in the universe," he said.

Kucinich's willingness to listen to non-mainstream groups has created some controversy. For instance, in his original 2001 bill to ban the use of weapons in space, Kucinich listed a series of weapons that should be outlawed. The list went beyond the interceptor missiles and subatomic particle beams often associated with government's "Star Wars" programs. His bill banned "other energies" directed at individuals or targeted groups for the purpose of "mood management or mind control."

It also banned "chemtrails."  The term chemtrails is part of a conspiracy theory that has been at the center of lively Internet chat room debates and radio talk shows. Its supporters believe the white streaks jets leave in the sky - known as contrails, which are formed by condensed water vapors - are actually toxic substances the government is spraying on people.

After being questioned about the bill last year, Kucinich rewrote it, removing the controversial language. "I'm not into that," he insisted. "Understand me. When I found out that was in there, I said, 'Look, I'm not interested in going there.' "

Kucinich said that whether he is talking to auto workers or patrons of a New Age expo, his message is the same and never far from home. "We cannot repair our communities, for health care and retirement securities, if we are going to spend money on a war," he said. "Peace is the path toward rebuilding America."

Plain Dealer reporter Tom Diemer and news researcher Jo Ellen Corrigan contributed to this story.

© 2003 The Plain Dealer.

Saturday, July 2, 2011

KUCINICH IS OUT OF LINE, OVER HIS HEAD


My Congressman, Dennis Kucinich, is at it again. He's trying to grab headlines to make himself relevant on the national scene.  From UFO sightings and a national contest to find a wife, to his "fact-finding mission" to Syria last month and his frequent outlandish ideas and statements (not to mention his miserable record as legislator and former mayor), for many of us in Ohio's 10th Congressional District, he's been nothing but an embarrassment for many years.  I know Syrian President Bashar Al Assad is running out of friends by the day, but if I were in his shoes, I'd try for more credible allies.

A note to my Congressman:  You clearly have no idea what you’re doing when it comes to Middle East affairs.  The tyranny of the last several decades is no child’s play.  It’s a complicated web of geopolitics, hatred, sectarianism, oppression and brutality.  As a constituent and a Lebanese American who lived through the Syrian occupation of Lebanon, I respectfully ask you to stick to what you know.  I sincerely hope and pray you will take no more trips to Syria and make no more statements about the Syrian uprising, Bashar Al Assad or the effect of the current situation on Lebanon. 

I may say more about this in the coming days, but for now, the Washington Post said it well in this editorial a few days ago.


 Published in the Washington Post on June 29, 2011

Rep. Kucinich takes the side of Syria’s murderous dictator

DENNIS KUCINICH claims he was misquoted. And perhaps it’s true: Maybe the Democratic representative didn’t exactly say, as the official Syrian news agency reported, that “President Bashar al-Assad cares so much about what is taking place in Syria . . . and everybody who meets him can be certain of this.” It could be that another quotation attributed to him, that “President al-Assad is highly loved and appreciated by the Syrians,” was a “mistranslation,” or a reflection of “the degree of appreciation and affection [the] state-sponsored media has” for the president, as a statement from Mr. Kucinich’s office delicately put it.

This much, however, appears to be uncontested: Mr. Kucinich, who has fiercely opposed the U.S. intervention against Libyan strongman Moammar Gaddafi, traveled to Damascus over the weekend to huddle with Syria’s dictator, who is desperately seeking to avoid being isolated and labeled illegitimate by the outside world. Thanks to the slaughter by his security forces of at least 1,400 people — the vast majority of them unarmed civilians — Mr. Assad has few friends these days: The European Union and United States have sanctioned him personally, and even his regime’s most faithful allies are close to abandoning him. On Tuesday, for example, a senior Russian diplomat met with leaders of the Syrian opposition, then declared that “Russia has only one friend — the Syrian people.”

But Mr. Assad still has a friend: Mr. Kucinich. The Cleveland lawmaker chose not just to meet with the ruler but also to hold a “press conference. ” Though he might not have heaped praise on Mr. Assad, Mr. Kucinich did endorse the regime’s latest propaganda strategy, which is to claim that it intends to engage opponents in a “dialogue” and then carry out reforms. “I have found a strong desire to make a substantial change,” the Xinhua news agency quoted Mr. Kucinich as saying. “People want President Bashar al-Assad to carry out reforms.” If the Chinese agency is also misrepresenting the congressman, his office hasn’t said so.
In fact, the hundreds of thousands of Syrians who have risked their lives to take to the streets since March are not seeking reforms from Mr. Assad — they are demanding the end of his regime. The idea that, having slaughtered so many of his people, Mr. Assad would agree to a political transition that would allow Syrians to vote for or against his ruling party — which is dominated by a minority ethnic group — is absurd.

That’s why the only people who take the regime’s rhetoric seriously are those who wish to defend it, who excuse its horrendous crimes and who oppose genuine democracy in Syria. Mr. Kucinich has just made himself one of the more conspicuous members of that camp.

© The Washington Post Company